Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P vs SharpStar 140PH

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 250P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

SharpStar 140PH
SharpStar

140PH

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+79% aperture
Faster by 3.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 250PSharpStar 140PH
Optics
Typenewtonianrefractor
Optical designNewtonian astrographApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture250mm140mm
Focal length1000mm980mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/7.0
Image circle52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg9.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • 79% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7
Advantages of SharpStar 140PH
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (9.5kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — SharpStar 140PH
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
SharpStar 140PH — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.10° × 1.40°Scale: 0.79"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.37° × 0.92°Scale: 0.79"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.66°Scale: 0.79"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

SharpStar 140PH — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives