Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P vs Takahashi TOA-130NFB

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 250P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Takahashi TOA-130NFB
Takahashi

TOA-130NFB

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+92% aperture
Faster by 3.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 250PTakahashi TOA-130NFB
Optics
Typenewtonianrefractor
Optical designNewtonian astrographApo triplet
Aperture250mm130mm
Focal length1000mm1000mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/7.7
Image circle88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg9.6kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • 92% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7.7
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (9.6kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Takahashi TOA-130NFB — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Takahashi TOA-130NFB — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives