Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 250P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 150ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+67% aperture
Faster by 3.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 250PSky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
Optics
TypenewtonianRefractor
Optical designNewtonian astrographTriplet APO
Aperture250mm150mm
Focal length1000mm1050mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/7.0
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg17.0kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • 67% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.96° × 1.31°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.28° × 0.86°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.62° × 0.62°Scale: 0.74"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives