Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 132 vs Vaonis Stellina

William Optics FLT 132
William Optics

FLT 132

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Vaonis Stellina
Vaonis

Stellina

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+131% focal length
+65% aperture
Slower by 2.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 132Vaonis Stellina
Optics
Typerefractorsmart-telescope
Optical designApo triplet FPL-53Apo doublet all-in-one
Aperture132mm80mm
Focal length925mm400mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.0
Image circle52mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight7.9kg11.2kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 132
  • Tighter framing — 925mm vs 400mm focal length
  • 65% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (7.9kg vs 11.2kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Vaonis Stellina
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 925mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/7
Best for — William Optics FLT 132
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Vaonis Stellina
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
William Optics FLT 132 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.23° × 1.49°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.46° × 0.97°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.84"/px
Vaonis Stellina — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
William Optics FLT 132 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Vaonis Stellina — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives