Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 132 vs Takahashi FSQ-85EDX

William Optics FLT 132
William Optics

FLT 132

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
Takahashi

FSQ-85EDX

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+106% focal length
+55% aperture
Slower by 1.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 132Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designApo triplet FPL-53Petzval APO
Aperture132mm85mm
Focal length925mm450mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.3
Image circle52mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.9kg4.0kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 132
  • Tighter framing — 925mm vs 450mm focal length
  • 55% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Wider field — 450mm vs 925mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.3 vs f/7
  • Lighter (4kg vs 7.9kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 132
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
William Optics FLT 132 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.23° × 1.49°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.46° × 0.97°Scale: 0.84"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.70° × 0.70°Scale: 0.84"/px
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
William Optics FLT 132 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives