Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 120 vs Vaonis Stellina

William Optics FLT 120
William Optics

FLT 120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Vaonis Stellina
Vaonis

Stellina

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+95% focal length
+50% aperture
Slower by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 120Vaonis Stellina
Optics
TypeRefractorsmart-telescope
Optical designTriplet APOApo doublet all-in-one
Aperture120mm80mm
Focal length780mm400mm
Native f/ratiof/6.5f/5.0
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight7.7kg11.2kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 120
  • Tighter framing — 780mm vs 400mm focal length
  • 50% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (7.7kg vs 11.2kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Vaonis Stellina
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 780mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/6.5
Best for — William Optics FLT 120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Vaonis Stellina
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
William Optics FLT 120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.64° × 1.76°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.73° × 1.15°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.83° × 0.83°Scale: 0.99"/px
Vaonis Stellina — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
William Optics FLT 120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Vaonis Stellina — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives