Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 120 vs Explore Scientific ED80 FCD-100

William Optics FLT 120
William Optics

FLT 120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Explore Scientific ED80 FCD-100
Explore Scientific

ED80 FCD-100

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+63% focal length
+50% aperture
Slower by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 120Explore Scientific ED80 FCD-100
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOApo triplet FCD-100
Aperture120mm80mm
Focal length780mm480mm
Native f/ratiof/6.5f/6.0
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight7.7kg4.5kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 120
  • Tighter framing — 780mm vs 480mm focal length
  • 50% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Explore Scientific ED80 FCD-100
  • Wider field — 480mm vs 780mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/6 vs f/6.5
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 7.7kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Explore Scientific ED80 FCD-100
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
William Optics FLT 120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.64° × 1.76°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.73° × 1.15°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.83° × 0.83°Scale: 0.99"/px
Explore Scientific ED80 FCD-100 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.30° × 2.86°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.81° × 1.87°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
William Optics FLT 120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Explore Scientific ED80 FCD-100 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives