Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

William Optics FLT 120 vs SharpStar 61EDPH III

William Optics FLT 120
William Optics

FLT 120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

SharpStar 61EDPH III
SharpStar

61EDPH III

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+133% focal length
+97% aperture
Slower by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationWilliam Optics FLT 120SharpStar 61EDPH III
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designTriplet APODoublet APO
Aperture120mm61mm
Focal length780mm335mm
Native f/ratiof/6.5f/5.5
Image circle44mm32mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight7.7kg2.4kg
Advantages of William Optics FLT 120
  • Tighter framing — 780mm vs 335mm focal length
  • 97% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of SharpStar 61EDPH III
  • Wider field — 335mm vs 780mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/6.5
  • Lighter (2.4kg vs 7.7kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — SharpStar 61EDPH III
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
William Optics FLT 120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.64° × 1.76°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.73° × 1.15°Scale: 0.99"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.83° × 0.83°Scale: 0.99"/px
SharpStar 61EDPH III — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 6.16° × 4.11°Scale: 2.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.02° × 2.69°Scale: 2.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.93° × 1.93°Scale: 2.32"/px
William Optics FLT 120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

SharpStar 61EDPH III — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives