telescopecomparison · 2-way
William Optics FLT 120 vs Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
William Optics
FLT 120
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Sky-Watcher
Evolux 62ED
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+117% focal length
+94% aperture
Slower by 0.7 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | William Optics FLT 120 | Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Triplet APO | Apo doublet FPL-53 |
| Aperture | 120mm | 62mm |
| Focal length | 780mm | 360mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/6.5 | f/5.8 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 44mm |
| Full-frame support | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 7.7kg | 2.2kg |
Advantages of William Optics FLT 120
- Tighter framing — 780mm vs 360mm focal length
- 94% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
- Wider field — 360mm vs 780mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/5.8 vs f/6.5
- Lighter (2.2kg vs 7.7kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — William Optics FLT 120
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
William Optics FLT 120 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.64° × 1.76°Scale: 0.99"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.73° × 1.15°Scale: 0.99"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.83° × 0.83°Scale: 0.99"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 5.73° × 3.82°Scale: 2.15"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.74° × 2.50°Scale: 2.15"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.80° × 1.80°Scale: 2.15"/px
William Optics FLT 120 — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.