Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi TSA-120 vs Takahashi Epsilon-160ED

Takahashi TSA-120
Takahashi

TSA-120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-160ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+70% focal length
-25% aperture
Slower by 4.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi TSA-120Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Optics
TypeRefractorNewtonian
Optical designTriplet APOHyperbolic astrograph
Aperture120mm160mm
Focal length900mm530mm
Native f/ratiof/7.5f/3.3
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.5kg10.0kg
Advantages of Takahashi TSA-120
  • Tighter framing — 900mm vs 530mm focal length
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 10kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Wider field — 530mm vs 900mm focal length
  • 33% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/7.5
Best for — Takahashi TSA-120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi TSA-120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.29° × 1.53°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.50° × 1.00°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.72° × 0.72°Scale: 0.86"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi TSA-120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives