Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi TSA-120 vs Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P

Takahashi TSA-120
Takahashi

TSA-120

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 150P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+50% focal length
-20% aperture
Slower by 3.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi TSA-120Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Optics
TypeRefractornewtonian
Optical designTriplet APONewtonian astrograph
Aperture120mm150mm
Focal length900mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/7.5f/4.0
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight7.5kg7.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi TSA-120
  • Tighter framing — 900mm vs 600mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • Wider field — 600mm vs 900mm focal length
  • 25% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7.5
Best for — Takahashi TSA-120
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Takahashi TSA-120 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.29° × 1.53°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.50° × 1.00°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.72° × 0.72°Scale: 0.86"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Takahashi TSA-120 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives