Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Mewlon-210 vs Askar SQA106

Takahashi Mewlon-210
Takahashi

Mewlon-210

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Askar SQA106
Askar

SQA106

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+316% focal length
+98% aperture
Slower by 6.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Mewlon-210Askar SQA106
Optics
Typecassegrainrefractor
Optical designDall-KirkhamQuadruplet astrograph FPL-51
Aperture210mm106mm
Focal length2415mm580mm
Native f/ratiof/11.5f/5.5
Image circle60mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg6.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Tighter framing — 2415mm vs 580mm focal length
  • 98% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Askar SQA106
  • Wider field — 580mm vs 2415mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/11.5
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (6.5kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Askar SQA106
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.56° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Askar SQA106 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.56° × 2.37°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.32° × 1.55°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.12° × 1.12°Scale: 1.34"/px
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Askar SQA106 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives