Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Mewlon-210 vs Askar FRA600

Takahashi Mewlon-210
Takahashi

Mewlon-210

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Askar FRA600
Askar

FRA600

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+303% focal length
+94% aperture
Slower by 5.9 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Mewlon-210Askar FRA600
Optics
TypecassegrainRefractor
Optical designDall-KirkhamPetzval Quintuplet APO
Aperture210mm108mm
Focal length2415mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/11.5f/5.6
Image circle60mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg7.8kg
Advantages of Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Tighter framing — 2415mm vs 600mm focal length
  • 94% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Askar FRA600
  • Wider field — 600mm vs 2415mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.6 vs f/11.5
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (7.8kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Askar FRA600
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.56° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Askar FRA600 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Askar FRA600 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives