Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-130ED vs Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P

Takahashi FSQ-130ED
Takahashi

FSQ-130ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 150P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+8% focal length
-13% aperture
Slower by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-130EDSky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Optics
Typerefractornewtonian
Optical designPetzval quadrupletNewtonian astrograph
Aperture130mm150mm
Focal length650mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/5.0f/4.0
Image circle88mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight11.0kg7.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-130ED
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • 15% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/5
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 11kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-130ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.17° × 2.12°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.07° × 1.38°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.00° × 1.00°Scale: 1.19"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives