telescopecomparison · 2-way
Takahashi FSQ-130ED vs Borg 107FL
Takahashi
FSQ-130ED
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Borg
107FL
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+8% focal length
+21% aperture
Faster by 0.6 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Takahashi FSQ-130ED | Borg 107FL |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval quadruplet | Apo doublet fluorite |
| Aperture | 130mm | 107mm |
| Focal length | 650mm | 600mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.0 | f/5.6 |
| Image circle | 88mm | — |
| Full-frame support | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 11.0kg | 3.5kg |
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-130ED
- 21% more light-gathering aperture
- Faster optics at f/5 vs f/5.6
- Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Borg 107FL
- Lighter (3.5kg vs 11kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-130ED
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Borg 107FL
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.17° × 2.12°Scale: 1.19"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.07° × 1.38°Scale: 1.19"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.00° × 1.00°Scale: 1.19"/px
Borg 107FL — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Borg 107FL — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.