Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-130ED vs Askar SQA106

Takahashi FSQ-130ED
Takahashi

FSQ-130ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar SQA106
Askar

SQA106

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+12% focal length
+23% aperture
Faster by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-130EDAskar SQA106
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval quadrupletQuadruplet astrograph FPL-51
Aperture130mm106mm
Focal length650mm580mm
Native f/ratiof/5.0f/5.5
Image circle88mm60mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight11.0kg6.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-130ED
  • Tighter framing — 650mm vs 580mm focal length
  • 23% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/5.5
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Askar SQA106
  • Wider field — 580mm vs 650mm focal length
  • Lighter (6.5kg vs 11kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-130ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar SQA106
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.17° × 2.12°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.07° × 1.38°Scale: 1.19"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.00° × 1.00°Scale: 1.19"/px
Askar SQA106 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.56° × 2.37°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.32° × 1.55°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.12° × 1.12°Scale: 1.34"/px
Takahashi FSQ-130ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Askar SQA106 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives