Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 vs Takahashi Epsilon-160ED

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-160ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-34% aperture
Slower by 1.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-106EDX4Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Optics
TypeRefractorNewtonian
Optical designPetzval APOHyperbolic astrograph
Aperture106mm160mm
Focal length530mm530mm
Native f/ratiof/5.0f/3.3
Image circle88mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.5kg10.0kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 10kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • 51% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/5
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives