Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 100ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+6% aperture
Faster by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FSQ-106EDX4Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designPetzval APOTriplet APO
Aperture106mm100mm
Focal length530mm550mm
Native f/ratiof/5.0f/5.5
Image circle88mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.5kg8.6kg
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/5.5
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.75° × 2.50°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.45° × 1.64°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 1.18°Scale: 1.41"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives