Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FC-100DZ vs Takahashi Epsilon-130D

Takahashi FC-100DZ
Takahashi

FC-100DZ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi Epsilon-130D
Takahashi

Epsilon-130D

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+86% focal length
-23% aperture
Slower by 4.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FC-100DZTakahashi Epsilon-130D
Optics
Typerefractorastrograph
Optical designApo doublet fluoriteHyperbolic Newtonian
Aperture100mm130mm
Focal length800mm430mm
Native f/ratiof/8.0f/3.3
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.3kg7.8kg
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Tighter framing — 800mm vs 430mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.3kg vs 7.8kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-130D
  • Wider field — 430mm vs 800mm focal length
  • 30% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/8
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-130D
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FC-100DZ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-130D — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.80° × 3.20°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.09°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.51° × 1.51°Scale: 1.80"/px
Takahashi FC-100DZ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi Epsilon-130D — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives