Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FC-100DZ vs Unistellar eVscope 2

Takahashi FC-100DZ
Takahashi

FC-100DZ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Unistellar eVscope 2
Unistellar

eVscope 2

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+78% focal length
-12% aperture
Slower by 4.1 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FC-100DZUnistellar eVscope 2
Optics
Typerefractorsmart-telescope
Optical designApo doublet fluoriteNewtonian all-in-one
Aperture100mm114mm
Focal length800mm450mm
Native f/ratiof/8.0f/3.9
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportNoNo
Physical
Weight3.3kg9.0kg
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Tighter framing — 800mm vs 450mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (3.3kg vs 9kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Unistellar eVscope 2
  • Wider field — 450mm vs 800mm focal length
  • 14% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.9 vs f/8
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Unistellar eVscope 2
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Takahashi FC-100DZ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Unistellar eVscope 2 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
Takahashi FC-100DZ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Unistellar eVscope 2 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives