Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FC-100DL vs Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4

Takahashi FC-100DL
Takahashi

FC-100DL

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+70% focal length
-6% aperture
Slower by 4.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FC-100DLTakahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designApo doublet fluoritePetzval APO
Aperture100mm106mm
Focal length900mm530mm
Native f/ratiof/9.0f/5.0
Image circle44mm88mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.3kg7.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DL
  • Tighter framing — 900mm vs 530mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.3kg vs 7.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Wider field — 530mm vs 900mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/9
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DL
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FC-100DL — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.29° × 1.53°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.50° × 1.00°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.72° × 0.72°Scale: 0.86"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi FC-100DL — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives