Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FC-100DL vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED

Takahashi FC-100DL
Takahashi

FC-100DL

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 100ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+64% focal length
Slower by 3.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FC-100DLSky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designApo doublet fluoriteTriplet APO
Aperture100mm100mm
Focal length900mm550mm
Native f/ratiof/9.0f/5.5
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.3kg8.6kg
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DL
  • Tighter framing — 900mm vs 550mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.3kg vs 8.6kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Wider field — 550mm vs 900mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/9
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DL
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FC-100DL — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.29° × 1.53°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.50° × 1.00°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.72° × 0.72°Scale: 0.86"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.75° × 2.50°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.45° × 1.64°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 1.18°Scale: 1.41"/px
Takahashi FC-100DL — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives