Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P vs Tele Vue TV-85

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 250P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Tele Vue TV-85
Tele Vue

TV-85

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+67% focal length
+194% aperture
Faster by 3.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 250PTele Vue TV-85
Optics
Typenewtonianrefractor
Optical designNewtonian astrographApo doublet
Aperture250mm85mm
Focal length1000mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/7.0
Image circle
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight15.5kg2.9kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Tighter framing — 1000mm vs 600mm focal length
  • 194% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7
Advantages of Tele Vue TV-85
  • Wider field — 600mm vs 1000mm focal length
  • Lighter (2.9kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Tele Vue TV-85
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Tele Vue TV-85 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Tele Vue TV-85 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives