Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P vs Borg 107FL

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 250P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Borg 107FL
Borg

107FL

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+67% focal length
+134% aperture
Faster by 1.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 250PBorg 107FL
Optics
Typenewtonianrefractor
Optical designNewtonian astrographApo doublet fluorite
Aperture250mm107mm
Focal length1000mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/5.6
Image circle
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg3.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Tighter framing — 1000mm vs 600mm focal length
  • 134% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/5.6
Advantages of Borg 107FL
  • Wider field — 600mm vs 1000mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.5kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Borg 107FL
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Borg 107FL — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Borg 107FL — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives