Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P vs Takahashi Epsilon-180ED

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 200P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-180ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+60% focal length
+11% aperture
Slower by 1.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 200PTakahashi Epsilon-180ED
Optics
TypeNewtonianastrograph
Optical designImaging NewtonianHyperbolic Newtonian
Aperture200mm180mm
Focal length800mm500mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/2.8
Image circle32mm44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight10.5kg12.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Tighter framing — 800mm vs 500mm focal length
  • 11% more light-gathering aperture
  • Lighter (10.5kg vs 12.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
  • Wider field — 500mm vs 800mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/2.8 vs f/4
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-180ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi Epsilon-180ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives