Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P vs Orion 8" f/3.9 Newtonian Astrograph

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 200P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Orion 8" f/3.9 Newtonian Astrograph
Orion

8" f/3.9 Newtonian Astrograph

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 200POrion 8" f/3.9 Newtonian Astrograph
Optics
TypeNewtoniannewtonian
Optical designImaging NewtonianNewtonian astrograph
Aperture200mm203mm
Focal length800mm800mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/3.9
Image circle32mm
Full-frame supportNoNo
Physical
Weight10.5kg10.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Larger image circle (32mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Orion 8" f/3.9 Newtonian Astrograph

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Orion 8" f/3.9 Newtonian Astrograph
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Orion 8" f/3.9 Newtonian Astrograph — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Orion 8" f/3.9 Newtonian Astrograph — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives