Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P vs Astro-Tech AT115EDT

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 200P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Astro-Tech AT115EDT
Astro-Tech

AT115EDT

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+74% aperture
Faster by 3.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 200PAstro-Tech AT115EDT
Optics
TypeNewtonianrefractor
Optical designImaging NewtonianApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture200mm115mm
Focal length800mm805mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/7.0
Image circle32mm52mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight10.5kg6.6kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • 74% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7
Advantages of Astro-Tech AT115EDT
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (6.6kg vs 10.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Astro-Tech AT115EDT
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Astro-Tech AT115EDT — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.56° × 1.71°Scale: 0.96"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.67° × 1.12°Scale: 0.96"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.80°Scale: 0.96"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Astro-Tech AT115EDT — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives