Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED vs Radian Raptor 75

Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
Sky-Watcher

Evolux 82ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Radian Raptor 75
Radian

Raptor 75

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+23% focal length
+9% aperture
Slower by 0.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Evolux 82EDRadian Raptor 75
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo doublet FPL-53Petzval quintuplet
Aperture82mm75mm
Focal length499mm405mm
Native f/ratiof/6.1f/5.4
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.6kg4.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
  • Tighter framing — 499mm vs 405mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.6kg vs 4.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Radian Raptor 75
  • Wider field — 405mm vs 499mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.4 vs f/6.1
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Best for — Radian Raptor 75
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.76°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.70° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.30° × 1.30°Scale: 1.55"/px
Radian Raptor 75 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.09° × 3.40°Scale: 1.91"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.32° × 2.22°Scale: 1.91"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.60° × 1.60°Scale: 1.91"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Radian Raptor 75 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives