Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED vs SharpStar 76EDPH

Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
Sky-Watcher

Evolux 82ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

SharpStar 76EDPH
SharpStar

76EDPH

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+19% focal length
+8% aperture
Slower by 0.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Evolux 82EDSharpStar 76EDPH
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designApo doublet FPL-53Doublet APO
Aperture82mm76mm
Focal length499mm418mm
Native f/ratiof/6.1f/5.5
Image circle44mm42mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.6kg3.2kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
  • Tighter framing — 499mm vs 418mm focal length
Advantages of SharpStar 76EDPH
  • Wider field — 418mm vs 499mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/6.1
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Best for — SharpStar 76EDPH
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.76°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.70° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.30° × 1.30°Scale: 1.55"/px
SharpStar 76EDPH — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.93° × 3.29°Scale: 1.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.22° × 2.15°Scale: 1.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.55° × 1.55°Scale: 1.86"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

SharpStar 76EDPH — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives