Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED vs Askar SQA106

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 150ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Askar SQA106
Askar

SQA106

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+81% focal length
+42% aperture
Slower by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 150EDAskar SQA106
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOQuadruplet astrograph FPL-51
Aperture150mm106mm
Focal length1050mm580mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.5
Image circle44mm60mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight17.0kg6.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Tighter framing — 1050mm vs 580mm focal length
  • 42% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Askar SQA106
  • Wider field — 580mm vs 1050mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/7
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (6.5kg vs 17kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Askar SQA106
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.96° × 1.31°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.28° × 0.86°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.62° × 0.62°Scale: 0.74"/px
Askar SQA106 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.56° × 2.37°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.32° × 1.55°Scale: 1.34"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.12° × 1.12°Scale: 1.34"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Askar SQA106 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives