Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED vs Tele Vue NP127fli

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 150ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Tele Vue NP127fli
Tele Vue

NP127fli

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+59% focal length
+18% aperture
Slower by 1.8 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 150EDTele Vue NP127fli
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APONagler-Petzval
Aperture150mm127mm
Focal length1050mm660mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.2
Image circle44mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight17.0kg9.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Tighter framing — 1050mm vs 660mm focal length
  • 18% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Tele Vue NP127fli
  • Wider field — 660mm vs 1050mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.2 vs f/7
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (9.5kg vs 17kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Tele Vue NP127fli
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.96° × 1.31°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.28° × 0.86°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.62° × 0.62°Scale: 0.74"/px
Tele Vue NP127fli — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.08°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.04° × 1.36°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.98° × 0.98°Scale: 1.18"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Tele Vue NP127fli — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives