telescopecomparison · 2-way
Radian Raptor 61 vs William Optics RedCat 61
William Optics
RedCat 61
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
-8% focal length
Faster by 0.4 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Radian Raptor 61 | William Optics RedCat 61 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | Refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval quadruplet | Petzval APO |
| Aperture | 61mm | 61mm |
| Focal length | 275mm | 300mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/4.5 | f/4.9 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 45mm |
| Full-frame support | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 2.6kg | 2.0kg |
Advantages of Radian Raptor 61
- Faster optics at f/4.5 vs f/4.9
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 61
- Lighter (2kg vs 2.6kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Radian Raptor 61
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — William Optics RedCat 61
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Radian Raptor 61 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 7.50° × 5.00°Scale: 2.82"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.90° × 3.27°Scale: 2.82"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.35° × 2.35°Scale: 2.82"/px
William Optics RedCat 61 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 6.88° × 4.58°Scale: 2.59"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.49° × 3.00°Scale: 2.59"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.16° × 2.16°Scale: 2.59"/px
Radian Raptor 61 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
William Optics RedCat 61 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.