telescopecomparison · 2-way
Radian Raptor 61 vs Borg 55FL
Key differences
+10% focal length
+11% aperture
Specifications
| Specification | Radian Raptor 61 | Borg 55FL |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Petzval quadruplet | Apo doublet fluorite |
| Aperture | 61mm | 55mm |
| Focal length | 275mm | 250mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/4.5 | f/4.5 |
| Image circle | 44mm | — |
| Full-frame support | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 2.6kg | 1.2kg |
Advantages of Radian Raptor 61
- 11% more light-gathering aperture
- Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Borg 55FL
- Lighter (1.2kg vs 2.6kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Radian Raptor 61
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — Borg 55FL
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Radian Raptor 61 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 7.50° × 5.00°Scale: 2.82"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.90° × 3.27°Scale: 2.82"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.35° × 2.35°Scale: 2.82"/px
Borg 55FL — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 3.10"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 5.39° × 3.60°Scale: 3.10"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.59° × 2.59°Scale: 3.10"/px
Radian Raptor 61 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Borg 55FL — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.