Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

QHYCCD QHY533M vs QHYCCD QHY9

QHYCCD QHY533M
QHYCCD

QHY533M

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

QHYCCD QHY9
QHYCCD

QHY9

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Key differences

-29% larger sensor
Finer pixels (3.76µm vs 5.4µm)
6% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationQHYCCD QHY533MQHYCCD QHY9
Sensor
TypeDedicated Cooleddedicated
SensorSony IMX533Kodak KAF-8300
Sensor techCMOSCCD
Format1"4/3"
Sensor size11.3×11.3mm18.0×13.5mm
Diagonal16.0mm22.5mm
Pixel size3.76µm5.40µm
Resolution3008×30083358×2536
Megapixels9.0MP8.5MP
ColorNoNo
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well50000e⁻25500e⁻
Peak QE80%56%
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY533M
  • Finer sampling at 3.76µm pixels
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY9
  • Larger sensor (22.5mm vs 16mm diagonal) — wider field
  • Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
Best for — QHYCCD QHY533M
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — QHYCCD QHY9
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
QHYCCD QHY533M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.59° × 2.59°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY9 — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 4.13° × 3.09°Scale: 4.46"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.29° × 0.97°Scale: 1.39"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.52° × 0.39°Scale: 0.56"/px
QHYCCD QHY533M — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

QHYCCD QHY9 — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Recommended alternatives