Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

QHYCCD QHY533M vs Player One Ares-M Pro

QHYCCD QHY533M
QHYCCD

QHY533M

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Player One Ares-M Pro
Player One

Ares-M Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Specifications

SpecificationQHYCCD QHY533MPlayer One Ares-M Pro
Sensor
TypeDedicated CooledDedicated Cooled
SensorSony IMX533Sony IMX533
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format1"1"
Sensor size11.3×11.3mm11.3×11.3mm
Diagonal16.0mm16.0mm
Pixel size3.76µm3.76µm
Resolution3008×30083008×3008
Megapixels9.0MP9.0MP
ColorNoNo
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well50000e⁻50000e⁻
Peak QE80%80%
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY533M

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Advantages of Player One Ares-M Pro

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — QHYCCD QHY533M
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — Player One Ares-M Pro
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
QHYCCD QHY533M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.59° × 2.59°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.39"/px
Player One Ares-M Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.59° × 2.59°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY533M — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Player One Ares-M Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Recommended alternatives