Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

QHYCCD QHY533M vs QHYCCD QHY163M

QHYCCD QHY533M
QHYCCD

QHY533M

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

QHYCCD QHY163M
QHYCCD

QHY163M

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Key differences

-28% larger sensor
-45% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationQHYCCD QHY533MQHYCCD QHY163M
Sensor
TypeDedicated Cooleddedicated
SensorSony IMX533Panasonic MN34230
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format1"4/3"
Sensor size11.3×11.3mm17.7×13.4mm
Diagonal16.0mm22.2mm
Pixel size3.76µm3.80µm
Resolution3008×30084656×3522
Megapixels9.0MP16.4MP
ColorNoNo
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well50000e⁻20000e⁻
Peak QE80%60%
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY533M

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Advantages of QHYCCD QHY163M
  • Larger sensor (22.2mm vs 16mm diagonal) — wider field
  • Higher resolution (16.4MP vs 9MP)
Best for — QHYCCD QHY533M
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — QHYCCD QHY163M
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
QHYCCD QHY533M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.59° × 2.59°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY163M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 4.06° × 3.07°Scale: 3.14"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.27° × 0.96°Scale: 0.98"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.51° × 0.38°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY533M — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

QHYCCD QHY163M — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Recommended alternatives