Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Meade LX200 8" ACF vs Meade LX200 10" ACF

Meade LX200 8" ACF
Meade

LX200 8" ACF

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Meade LX200 10" ACF
Meade

LX200 10" ACF

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

-20% focal length
-20% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationMeade LX200 8" ACFMeade LX200 10" ACF
Optics
Typesctsct
Optical designAdvanced Coma-FreeAdvanced Coma-Free
Aperture203mm254mm
Focal length2032mm2540mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/10.0
Image circle
Full-frame supportNoNo
Physical
Weight10.0kg13.6kg
Advantages of Meade LX200 8" ACF
  • Wider field — 2032mm vs 2540mm focal length
  • Lighter (10kg vs 13.6kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Meade LX200 10" ACF
  • Tighter framing — 2540mm vs 2032mm focal length
  • 25% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — Meade LX200 8" ACF
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Meade LX200 10" ACF
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Meade LX200 8" ACF — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Meade LX200 10" ACF — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.54°Scale: 0.31"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.53° × 0.35°Scale: 0.31"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.25° × 0.25°Scale: 0.31"/px
Meade LX200 8" ACF — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Meade LX200 10" ACF — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives