telescopecomparison · 2-way
Meade LX200 8" ACF vs Celestron EdgeHD 8
Meade
LX200 8" ACF
Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.
Celestron
EdgeHD 8
Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.
Specifications
| Specification | Meade LX200 8" ACF | Celestron EdgeHD 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | sct | SCT |
| Optical design | Advanced Coma-Free | Aplanatic SCT |
| Aperture | 203mm | 203mm |
| Focal length | 2032mm | 2032mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/10.0 | f/10.0 |
| Image circle | — | 42mm |
| Full-frame support | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 10.0kg | 6.4kg |
Advantages of Meade LX200 8" ACF
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 8
- Larger image circle (42mm) — supports bigger sensors
- Lighter (6.4kg vs 10kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Meade LX200 8" ACF
- Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
- High-resolution long-exposure work
- Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 8
- Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
- High-resolution long-exposure work
- Faint-object imaging under dark skies
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Meade LX200 8" ACF — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Meade LX200 8" ACF — recommended user
Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — recommended user
Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.