Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron RASA 8 vs Takahashi FSQ-85EDX

Celestron RASA 8
Celestron

RASA 8

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
Takahashi

FSQ-85EDX

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-11% focal length
+139% aperture
Faster by 3.3 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron RASA 8Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
Optics
TypeSCTRefractor
Optical designRowe-Ackermann SchmidtPetzval APO
Aperture203mm85mm
Focal length400mm450mm
Native f/ratiof/2.0f/5.3
Image circle32mm44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight7.7kg4.0kg
Advantages of Celestron RASA 8
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 450mm focal length
  • 139% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2 vs f/5.3
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Tighter framing — 450mm vs 400mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (4kg vs 7.7kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Celestron RASA 8
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-85EDX
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron RASA 8 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.58° × 3.06°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.99° × 2.00°Scale: 1.72"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.44° × 1.44°Scale: 1.72"/px
Celestron RASA 8 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-85EDX — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives