telescopecomparison · 2-way
Celestron RASA 8 vs Vaonis Stellina
Celestron
RASA 8
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.
Vaonis
Stellina
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
+154% aperture
Faster by 3.0 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Celestron RASA 8 | Vaonis Stellina |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | SCT | smart-telescope |
| Optical design | Rowe-Ackermann Schmidt | Apo doublet all-in-one |
| Aperture | 203mm | 80mm |
| Focal length | 400mm | 400mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/2.0 | f/5.0 |
| Image circle | 32mm | — |
| Full-frame support | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 7.7kg | 11.2kg |
Advantages of Celestron RASA 8
- 154% more light-gathering aperture
- Faster optics at f/2 vs f/5
- Larger image circle (32mm) — supports bigger sensors
- Lighter (7.7kg vs 11.2kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Vaonis Stellina
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Best for — Celestron RASA 8
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Vaonis Stellina
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Celestron RASA 8 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
Vaonis Stellina — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
Celestron RASA 8 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.
Vaonis Stellina — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.