Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 8 vs Takahashi Epsilon-160ED

Celestron EdgeHD 8
Celestron

EdgeHD 8

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-160ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+283% focal length
+27% aperture
Slower by 6.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 8Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Optics
TypeSCTNewtonian
Optical designAplanatic SCTHyperbolic astrograph
Aperture203mm160mm
Focal length2032mm530mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/3.3
Image circle42mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight6.4kg10.0kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Tighter framing — 2032mm vs 530mm focal length
  • 27% more light-gathering aperture
  • Lighter (6.4kg vs 10kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Wider field — 530mm vs 2032mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/10
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives