Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 8 vs Celestron RASA 8

Celestron EdgeHD 8
Celestron

EdgeHD 8

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Celestron RASA 8
Celestron

RASA 8

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+408% focal length
Slower by 8.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 8Celestron RASA 8
Optics
TypeSCTSCT
Optical designAplanatic SCTRowe-Ackermann Schmidt
Aperture203mm203mm
Focal length2032mm400mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/2.0
Image circle42mm32mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight6.4kg7.7kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Tighter framing — 2032mm vs 400mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (42mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (6.4kg vs 7.7kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Celestron RASA 8
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 2032mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/2 vs f/10
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 8
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Celestron RASA 8
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.02° × 0.68°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.44°Scale: 0.38"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.38"/px
Celestron RASA 8 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 8 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Celestron RASA 8 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives