Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 11 vs Takahashi Mewlon-210

Celestron EdgeHD 11
Celestron

EdgeHD 11

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Takahashi Mewlon-210
Takahashi

Mewlon-210

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+16% focal length
+33% aperture
Faster by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 11Takahashi Mewlon-210
Optics
Typesctcassegrain
Optical designAplanatic SCTDall-Kirkham
Aperture279mm210mm
Focal length2800mm2415mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/11.5
Image circle42mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight12.7kg15.5kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 11
  • Tighter framing — 2800mm vs 2415mm focal length
  • 33% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/10 vs f/11.5
  • Larger image circle (42mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (12.7kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Wider field — 2415mm vs 2800mm focal length
Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 11
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Celestron EdgeHD 11 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.74° × 0.49°Scale: 0.28"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.48° × 0.32°Scale: 0.28"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.23° × 0.23°Scale: 0.28"/px
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.56° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 11 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Takahashi Mewlon-210 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives