Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Celestron EdgeHD 11 vs Meade LX200 10" ACF

Celestron EdgeHD 11
Celestron

EdgeHD 11

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Meade LX200 10" ACF
Meade

LX200 10" ACF

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+10% focal length
+10% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationCelestron EdgeHD 11Meade LX200 10" ACF
Optics
Typesctsct
Optical designAplanatic SCTAdvanced Coma-Free
Aperture279mm254mm
Focal length2800mm2540mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/10.0
Image circle42mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight12.7kg13.6kg
Advantages of Celestron EdgeHD 11
  • Tighter framing — 2800mm vs 2540mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (42mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Meade LX200 10" ACF

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — Celestron EdgeHD 11
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Meade LX200 10" ACF
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Celestron EdgeHD 11 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.74° × 0.49°Scale: 0.28"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.48° × 0.32°Scale: 0.28"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.23° × 0.23°Scale: 0.28"/px
Meade LX200 10" ACF — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.54°Scale: 0.31"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.53° × 0.35°Scale: 0.31"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.25° × 0.25°Scale: 0.31"/px
Celestron EdgeHD 11 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Meade LX200 10" ACF — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives