Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Astro-Tech AT12RC vs Takahashi Mewlon-210

Astro-Tech AT12RC
Astro-Tech

AT12RC

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Takahashi Mewlon-210
Takahashi

Mewlon-210

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+45% aperture
Faster by 3.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAstro-Tech AT12RCTakahashi Mewlon-210
Optics
Typeritchey-chretiencassegrain
Optical designTruss Ritchey-ChrétienDall-Kirkham
Aperture305mm210mm
Focal length2432mm2415mm
Native f/ratiof/8.0f/11.5
Image circle
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight26.5kg15.5kg
Advantages of Astro-Tech AT12RC
  • 45% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/8 vs f/11.5
Advantages of Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Lighter (15.5kg vs 26.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Astro-Tech AT12RC
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi Mewlon-210
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Astro-Tech AT12RC — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.55° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Takahashi Mewlon-210 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.56° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Astro-Tech AT12RC — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Takahashi Mewlon-210 — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives