Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Astro-Tech AT12RC vs Celestron C9.25 SCT

Astro-Tech AT12RC
Astro-Tech

AT12RC

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Celestron C9.25 SCT
Celestron

C9.25 SCT

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+30% aperture
Faster by 2.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAstro-Tech AT12RCCelestron C9.25 SCT
Optics
Typeritchey-chretiensct
Optical designTruss Ritchey-ChrétienSchmidt-Cassegrain
Aperture305mm235mm
Focal length2432mm2350mm
Native f/ratiof/8.0f/10.0
Image circle
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight26.5kg9.5kg
Advantages of Astro-Tech AT12RC
  • 30% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/8 vs f/10
Advantages of Celestron C9.25 SCT
  • Lighter (9.5kg vs 26.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Astro-Tech AT12RC
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Celestron C9.25 SCT
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Astro-Tech AT12RC — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.55° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Celestron C9.25 SCT — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.88° × 0.59°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.57° × 0.38°Scale: 0.33"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.28° × 0.28°Scale: 0.33"/px
Astro-Tech AT12RC — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Celestron C9.25 SCT — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives