Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar 130PHQ vs SharpStar 94EDPH

Askar 130PHQ
Askar

130PHQ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

SharpStar 94EDPH
SharpStar

94EDPH

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+93% focal length
+38% aperture
Slower by 2.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAskar 130PHQSharpStar 94EDPH
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designPetzval quintuplet FPL-51Apo triplet FPL-53
Aperture130mm94mm
Focal length1000mm518mm
Native f/ratiof/7.7f/5.5
Image circle60mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight10.2kg4.5kg
Advantages of Askar 130PHQ
  • Tighter framing — 1000mm vs 518mm focal length
  • 38% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of SharpStar 94EDPH
  • Wider field — 518mm vs 1000mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/7.7
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 10.2kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar 130PHQ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — SharpStar 94EDPH
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar 130PHQ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
SharpStar 94EDPH — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.98° × 2.65°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.60° × 1.74°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.25° × 1.25°Scale: 1.50"/px
Askar 130PHQ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

SharpStar 94EDPH — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives