Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Askar 130PHQ vs Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4

Askar 130PHQ
Askar

130PHQ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+89% focal length
+23% aperture
Slower by 2.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationAskar 130PHQTakahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designPetzval quintuplet FPL-51Petzval APO
Aperture130mm106mm
Focal length1000mm530mm
Native f/ratiof/7.7f/5.0
Image circle60mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight10.2kg7.5kg
Advantages of Askar 130PHQ
  • Tighter framing — 1000mm vs 530mm focal length
  • 23% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Wider field — 530mm vs 1000mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/7.7
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 10.2kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Askar 130PHQ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Askar 130PHQ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Askar 130PHQ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives