Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

ZWO ASI585MC Pro vs ToupTek IMX585C

ZWO ASI585MC Pro
ZWO

ASI585MC Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ToupTek IMX585C
ToupTek

IMX585C

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Key differences

Cooled sensor

Specifications

SpecificationZWO ASI585MC ProToupTek IMX585C
Sensor
TypeDedicated Cooledplanetary
SensorSony IMX585Sony IMX585
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format1/1.2-inch1/1.2"
Sensor size11.2×6.3mm11.2×6.3mm
Diagonal12.8mm12.9mm
Pixel size2.90µm2.90µm
Resolution3840×21603856×2180
Megapixels8.3MP8.4MP
ColorYesYes
Cooling
CooledYesNo
Performance
Full well40000e⁻38000e⁻
Peak QE91%91%
Advantages of ZWO ASI585MC Pro
  • Regulated cooling for long exposures
Advantages of ToupTek IMX585C

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — ZWO ASI585MC Pro
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — ToupTek IMX585C
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
ZWO ASI585MC Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.57° × 1.44°Scale: 2.39"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.45°Scale: 0.75"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.18°Scale: 0.30"/px
ToupTek IMX585C — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.57° × 1.44°Scale: 2.39"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.45°Scale: 0.75"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.18°Scale: 0.30"/px
ZWO ASI585MC Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ToupTek IMX585C — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Recommended alternatives