Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

ZWO ASI385MC vs ZWO ASI662MC

ZWO ASI385MC
ZWO

ASI385MC

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ZWO ASI662MC
ZWO

ASI662MC

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Key differences

30% larger sensor
Larger pixels (3.75µm vs 2.9µm)

Specifications

SpecificationZWO ASI385MCZWO ASI662MC
Sensor
Typededicateddedicated
SensorSony IMX385Sony IMX662
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format1/2"1/2.8"
Sensor size7.3×4.1mm5.6×3.2mm
Diagonal8.4mm6.5mm
Pixel size3.75µm2.90µm
Resolution1936×10961920×1080
Megapixels2.1MP2.1MP
ColorYesYes
Cooling
CooledNoNo
Performance
Full well25000e⁻38000e⁻
Peak QE80%91%
Advantages of ZWO ASI385MC
  • Larger sensor (8.4mm vs 6.46mm diagonal) — wider field
  • Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
Advantages of ZWO ASI662MC
  • Finer sampling at 2.9µm pixels
Best for — ZWO ASI385MC
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — ZWO ASI662MC
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
ZWO ASI385MC — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 1.67° × 0.94°Scale: 3.09"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.52° × 0.29°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.21° × 0.12°Scale: 0.39"/px
ZWO ASI662MC — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 1.28° × 0.73°Scale: 2.39"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.40° × 0.23°Scale: 0.75"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.16° × 0.09°Scale: 0.30"/px
ZWO ASI385MC — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

ZWO ASI662MC — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Recommended alternatives